Originally Posted by Nathan D. Band
"Miers has no prior judicial service and has never argued a case before the Supreme Court."
Does this worry anyone?
So there is no history of judgements from which someone can get an idea of the nominees' views on various subjects. Republicans have gotten very good at having their supreme court nominees answer questions without actually giving a definitive idea on where the nominee stands on certain issues. This has been seen with the recent apointment of John Roberts. Though I imagine since Justice O'Connor has agreed to remain on the court until the replacement is confirmed, this hearing process wont be as rushed as it was for Justice Roberts.
I have been touched by his noodly appendage.
"I think we can all look forward to the time when these three theories are given equal time in our science classrooms across the country, and eventually the world; One third time for Intelligent Design, one third time for Flying Spaghetti Monsterism, and one third time for logical conjecture based on overwhelming observable evidence."