Drew Community  

Go Back   Drew Community > General Forums > Announcements & General Discussion
uLogin ID  
Password
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2010, 11:07 AM
Rachel B. Posner's Avatar
Rachel B. Posner Rachel B. Posner is offline
Junior Drewid
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 83
Default Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age

Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age

Interesting. Worth a read.
__________________
Rachel Posner
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2010, 11:11 PM
Rosemary McLaughlin Rosemary McLaughlin is offline
Squirrel
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 22
Default

Thanks for posting that, Rachel. Well worth reading indeed.
Great profile image, too, btw.
(I've always liked "Mme X")
-Rosemary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2010, 11:38 PM
Hezekiah Michael Sudol's Avatar
Hezekiah Michael Sudol Hezekiah Michael Sudol is offline
Ranger Cub
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 44
Default

Quote:
In an interview, she [Blum] said the idea of an author whose singular effort creates an original work is rooted in Enlightenment ideas of the individual. It is buttressed by the Western concept of intellectual property rights as secured by copyright law. But both traditions are being challenged.

“Our notion of authorship and originality was born, it flourished, and it may be waning,” Ms. Blum said.
During the Renaissance, I am quite certain that William Shakespeare was regarded as the originator of his works. I am also quite certain that before it was burned down by order of the Archbishop of Alexandria, the scrolls in the Library of Alexandria had authors listed for most of the works. We know that Euclid's Elements was Euclid's, we know that Sappho's poems were Sappho's, and we know that Aristotle's Organon was Aristotle's.

A person who downloads a piece of music, a book or a movie through peer-to-peer software does not hand in that song, movie or book to a professor and claim to be the creator. While copyright and intellectual property laws may have influenced our ideas about authorship and originality, a song by Madonna is a song by Madonna, regardless of how a person obtains it--no filesharer would ever claim that a song by Madonna was not a song by Madonna just because it was downloaded through p2p software.

While there are probably people who plagiarize on this campus who also use peer-to-peer software, I bet there are also people who plagiarize assignments who don't use peer-to-peer software--and, more importantly, people who use peer-to-peer software and don't plagiarize assignments. It doesn't follow that increased access to information results in increased plagiarism.

The best solution for plagiarism is for the professor to explain to the student how what the student did constitutes plagiarism (something Drew students are drilled on in the Writing requirement course) and then give the plagiarizing student a failing grade for the assignment. If the student plagiarizes a second time, a failing grade for the course. If a student fails more than one course due to plagiarism, expulsion may be in order. How has this system not worked in the past?
__________________
Hezekiah Michael Sudol
Philosophy major
Physics minor
Webmaster, Drew Alliance
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.5.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Drew University is not responsible for the content of posts made on this site. All posts and comments reflect the opinion of the author.